| THE URBAN FORESTRY ORGANISATION
LIMITED
Arboricultural Implications Assessment,
Relating to the Site for
Proposed Community
Centre, Fontley
Road,
Titchfield, Hampshire,
PO15 6QR
The
Arboricultural Implications Assessment
( AIA)
A consequence of the development of the Community Centre
at Fontley Road will be the removal of tree numbers 4 and 8. The loss of these trees is not
substantial as they are both poor specimens with relatively short useful lives. They can be more than adequately
replaced by the new planting which is proposed as part of the redevelopment process.
There will also be some
minor losses of vegetation at the site entrance as the access to the site will need to be widened and formalised
and the sight lines should be improved. These losses will be fairly
insignificant.
We are not aware of any
relevant Tree Preservation Orders and do not believe that the site is within a Conservation Area. Although we have
not checked this detail with the Local Authority and for completeness we would suggest that that task is undertaken
before the commencement of any tree works. The removal of tree numbers 4 and 8 will not require a felling
licence.
If not already dealt with
the following need to be considered:
1) Will the new development significantly affect the amenity value of the retained
trees? It is our view that it will not do so.
2) The
above and below ground constraints. See RPA and TCP above where these matters are fully
considered.
3) The type and nature
of the construction of the new development has been discussed with the Architects. We have been fully appraised of
the type and process of construction. The new build is in the centre of the site and should not conflict at all
with the retained trees which are all on the boundaries of the site.
4) The
infrastructure requirements. We have seen appropriately detailed drawings relating to these matters which confirm
that the infrastructure requirements of the new build will not cause any significant ground disturbance close to
the retained trees. The service and drainage routes will utilise the pre-existing
corridors.
5) Minor access facilitation pruning may be
required to the Silver Birch in the grounds of the bungalow at the entrance to the site. This will not be
substantial and in any event we have recommended that this Silver Birch be removed as it is damaging the
adjacent retaining wall. It is recommended that any such tree work be undertaken by a suitably
trained, experienced and approved Arboricultural contractor.
6) We have already assessed the probable impact the new development will have on the
trees and vice versa, and have taken into account the characteristics and the condition of the trees and
whether or not their future growth will cause problems. We believe it will not do
so.
7) Leaf fall from trees may have the
potential to block gutters however the retained trees are unlikely to cause a problem as they are a substantial
distance away from the site of the new building.
On the proviso that our
recommendations are followed to the letter we believe that the trees specified for retention at Community Centre
site at Fontley Road can be successfully retained during the redevelopment process and that they will not be unduly
compromised by virtue of that redevelopment process.
|